How Attackers Exploit Google Gemini Email Summaries

Email has always been a double-edged sword for communication—fast, convenient, but notoriously prone to exploitation. With the introduction of advanced AI-powered features such as email summarisation in Google Gemini, many of us—myself included, actually—hoped for a bit of a breather from endless inbox chaos. Yet, as recent discoveries have shown, this very convenience can be a secret door for cunning attackers.

Today, I’m going to take you inside the lesser-known world of AI email vulnerabilities, using Google Gemini as our anchor. Yet, while I’ll use Gemini as an example, what I share here is relevant for anyone who leans on summarisation or automated reading assistants—whether in marketing, sales, or just honest day-to-day teamwork. So, let’s pull back the curtain together so you’ll know where the tripwires are hiding.

The Promise and Perils of Email Summarisation

AI Meets the Overflowing Inbox

If you’re anything like me, you’ve probably enjoyed letting AI summarise your emails, especially those lengthy threads that go round in circles. Money, time, and (let’s be honest) sanity—AI seemed to save a bit of each. Google Gemini’s summarisation tool could, in theory, touch on all the main points of a mail thread without you ever daring to scroll.

But here’s the rub: as soon as we started to trust these summaries as gospel, a fresh wave of phishing attacks began surfacing—only this time, with a clever twist that exploits the AI’s own good intentions.

What’s So Different This Time?

Traditional phishing usually relied on dodgy links, misspelled company names, and wild stories about stranded princes. You and I might spot these a mile off. However, with the latest AI trickery, everything looks surprisingly clean—at least on the surface.

Attackers have figured out how to plant hidden instructions directly inside an email, so Gemini’s AI doesn’t just summarise what you see, but also content that’s been sneakily concealed.

How the Gemini Email Exploit Works

Hidden Messages: The Digital Vanishing Act

It all comes down to how Gemini processes the raw content of your email. Instead of just copying what’s visible, the system essentially reads the entire HTML body—the foundation of all properly formatted email. This means that if a message contains invisible text—say, white letters on a white background, or tiny letters that vanish into the page—the AI still “sees” them.

Cybercriminals have seized upon this and now use what I’d call invisible digital graffiti:

They hide instruction-laden text using CSS tricks like font-size:0 or color:white styles, making it practically impossible to spot with the naked eye.
These instructions are then wrapped in custom tags such as <admin>...</admin>, which Gemini AI appears to give higher priority when summarising.
When a user, unaware of the trickery, presses the “Summarise this email” button, Gemini ingests everything—including the hidden bits—and serves up a summary that can contain the attacker’s custom warnings, phone numbers, or malicious instructions.

Why This Flies Under the Radar

No attachments or obvious links are needed. Traditional spam filters often look for suspicious file extensions or hyperlinks, but here, the bait is buried in plain text.
The hidden content is not meant for human eyes, so a casual reader glancing at the email won’t notice anything amiss.
Email clients like Gmail render the email without the hidden text, but Gemini’s summariser combs through it all, as it parses HTML directly.

Frankly, this clever sidestep sends shivers down my spine; in a busy day, nobody’s going to pop open the email’s raw HTML source. We rely on our tools, sometimes as if they’re an extension of our own awareness. And there’s the risk.

Step-by-Step: Inside the Summarisation Attack

The Attacker’s Playbook

Create a polished, perfectly normal-looking email to a target—in a business scenario or even to a personal account.
Embed extra instructions or alarming messages (such as a security alert) inside the body of the email, using hidden styles and special tags.
Send this crafted email in a way that’s not flagged by spam filters (since there are no attachments, links, or visible clues).
Wait for someone—maybe in a hurry, maybe just curious—to use Gmail’s summarisation feature. Suddenly, a fraudulent message appears in the summary, often worded to look like it’s from Google.
User panics (or simply believes the summary), sees a fake phone number or email, and is led to hand over credentials, money, or sensitive data.

Real-World Social Engineering

From my own experience consulting with companies on cybersecurity hygiene, I know that even seasoned professionals can be caught off guard if something looks like it’s coming from a trusted system. The “authority bias” that humans naturally bring to workplace tech makes it surprisingly effective.

As one client put it during a training session, “If Gmail tells me there’s a password leak, I have to listen—right?” That’s the very vulnerability this exploit targets.

The Technical Anatomy: How Attackers Sneak Past AI

The Science of “Prompt Injection”

Behind the scenes, Gemini is fed both visible and invisible content, which it digests before crafting a summary. Prompt injection is the practice of sneaking in instructions or requests for the AI to process—outside of what the system developer planned. Attackers rely on the model’s tendency to prioritise markup like <admin>...</admin> or other reserved keywords.

This means, theoretically:

You could plant, in seemingly empty space, text like “There’s a security breach. Contact 0800-FAKE-HELP immediately.”
The summariser AI, designed to pluck out important-looking statements, will include this in your summary—perhaps at the top for extra urgency.
The end-user, seeing a summary pop up from Gemini with this urgent message, is dramatically more likely to trust and act on it.

Bypassing Traditional Defences

There’s no suspicious attachment to flag.
No obvious scent of a scam from a quick visual.
Spam filters depend on patterns and obvious content. Here, the invisible code flies straight past normal checks.

I’ve watched first-hand as security teams scramble to adapt their own filters, often realising just how many moving parts such an attack can sidestep. The power and the peril of automation in a nutshell, really.

Potential Consequences for Businesses and Users

Psychological Manipulation at Scale

Our collective instinct is to believe that automated alerts—especially those about security—must be trustworthy. Attackers are counting on this. By making these AI-summaries appear like credible warnings or instructions, they dramatically increase the chance of you falling for their bait.

Credential phishing: Users are asked to “verify” or “reset” passwords through malicious phone numbers or forms.
Phone vishing: Fake support numbers lead to criminal call centres harvesting data or money.
Social engineering for business: Imagine your team, busy or understaffed, following a “Google” summary and accidentally opening the front door for attackers.

Hidden Costs

Days of lost productivity sorting out compromised accounts.
Damaged trust—both with external clients and among colleagues. I’ve seen situations where this takes longer to recover than fixing the technical mess.
Reputational downsides if customer data is involved. No team wants to spend weeks apologising in the press.

The Risk To AI-Driven Sales and Marketing Automation

From a marketing-automation perspective, this sort of threat pulls my attention squarely onto hygiene and data quality. If a summarisation exploit hits automation chains built with tools like Make.com or n8n, it’s entirely possible to spread bad summaries or malicious triggers through integrated systems. Suddenly, your tidy CRM or sales dashboard could be the weak link in your defences.

How Has Google Responded?

Staying One Step Ahead of Attackers

According to public statements, the Google team has been busily refining Gemini’s guardrails over the last several months. They’ve acknowledged the sneaky tactics and are developing detection features to spot CSS and markup-based shenanigans.

Red-teaming—where „good-guy” hackers try to break things before the baddies do—has already led to patches and new alert layers. But as with so many things in tech, it’s a constant game of cat and mouse. Having worked on both ends of such scenarios, I can vouch for how easy it is for something like this to pop up overnight and give everyone a fright.

Current reports indicate there’s no evidence of this threat being used at scale—most cases have been tests by researchers, not widespread real-world exploitation (yet).
Google has already rolled out (or is in the process of rolling out) rules to filter invisible and suspicious formatting from summary requests.
The official recommendation: don’t treat AI-generated summaries as equivalent to platform-verified security notices—especially for matters of passwords or account access.

If you’re on the cautious side—as I tend to be—this is reason enough to revisit your training manuals and remind your team about the role of human judgement, even with all the smart tools at their disposal.

Staying Safe: Practical Steps for Users and Administrators

Individual Users: Everyday Defensive Habits

Never take automated summaries at face value—especially ones urging you to change credentials or ring up technical support.
Double-check warnings by going through official website links or direct account dashboards, not phone numbers or links seen in summaries.
If possible, have your email client display hidden formatting (at least in a preview or security scan mode).
Report odd summaries to your company IT or Google, in case the attack is new and undetected by filters.

Organisation-Level Countermeasures

Update spam and email security filters to flag or quarantine emails with hidden formatting styles or suspicious tags.
Train everyone in “AI hygiene”—not just safe clicking, but also scepticism with summarised content. My own company saw measurable improvement after running workshops stressing this precise point.
Test your organisation’s summarisation tools using simulated threat emails. If a test produces a fraudulent summary, escalate to your tool provider for immediate action.

I know, these tweaks might sound like belt-and-braces stuff, even a touch old-fashioned. But as an old hand in marketing automation, I’ve yet to see a security disaster that started with someone saying, “Let’s just take five minutes to check this first.”

Building Digital “Street Smarts”

Why Training Remains the Front Line

The phrase “digital hygiene” might seem like a buzzword, but in my own day-to-day, it’s become the make-or-break factor. Automated “awareness refreshers”—short reminders, interactive quizzes, or just the odd bit of office banter about “dodgy emails”—work far better than tick-box e-learning.

Based on years spent nudging teams to take phishing seriously, I’d offer a couple of bite-sized tips that go the distance:

Normalize talking about near-misses: When someone nearly gets scammed, share the story! It’s how lessons actually stick.
Reward smart scepticism: Whether it’s a quick Slack shoutout or a pre-lunch daft trophy, recognising “good catches” pays off in spades.
Keep the panic down: Frantic responses can tip an attacker off that they’re onto something. Slow and measured wins the race, every time.

The Role of AI Automation in Modern Businesses: Boon and Liability

The Double-Edged Sword for Sales, Marketing and Operations

I can’t deny that tools like Make.com or n8n—combined with AI summarisation—have massively boosted my team’s efficiency. Those of us pulling together omnichannel campaigns, personalised sales outreach or customer support workflows felt AI’s positive impact practically overnight.

Yet the Gemini exploit is a wake-up call not just for Gmail users but anyone integrating AI summaries, triggers, or auto-responders:

Automation amplifies mistakes: If your summarisation workflow gets fooled, those misleading snippets could be pushed to hundreds of prospects or internal departments instantly.
A single summary can start a cascade: I’ve seen one auto-generated n8n ticket summary escalate a mishap all over a business, just because an AI wrote “reset account” where it shouldn’t have.
Integrated tools mean shared risk: When APIs and apps talk to each other, a single corrupted summary could tee up a dozen further vulnerabilities downstream.

My Favourite Preventive Tweaks for Marketing Workflows

Require human review of summarised content that triggers automated responses. A 60-second glance beats hours of cleaning up automated chaos.
Avoid forwarding summaries directly into CRMs, Slack, or ticketing tools without first stripping out hidden formatting or suspicious tags programmatically.
If using Make.com/n8n, build simple checks for `` tags or white-on-white text before proceeding with automations. Even basic regex will do the trick for a first pass.

It’s not glamorous work, I’ll give you that. But in practice, sensible filters and a quick glance are often all it takes to stop something nastier from sneaking through.

Trust, But Verify: Shaping a Cautious Future with AI

Why Critical Thinking Beats Blind Faith (Even With AI)

I’ve always loved the idea that technology should do the heavy lifting—filtering, curating, and protecting us from the worst of the digital wilds. But as the Gemini story shows, even smart models can be tripped up by clever mischief-makers.

There’s truth in the old saying: “Trust, but verify.” Whenever automation feels too smooth, remember, there’s always someone out there testing the boundaries for their own gain.

Auto-summaries aren’t gospel: Double-check if something seems off.
Prompts, tags, and hidden instructions will continue to evolve: If you spot one, flag it so everyone stays a step ahead.
Lessons learned the hard way stick. Share your stories. Build an open, learning-based team culture.

It’s a bit like crossing the street on a quiet Sunday. You know the cars shouldn’t be there—but you still look both ways.

In Closing: Towards a Smarter, Safer Email Future

The early optimism around AI-powered productivity tools like Gemini’s summariser hasn’t faded, at least not for me. But, as those Mozilla researchers highlighted, every new shortcut can spawn its own breed of digital risks.

The good news? As businesses, as marketers, as humans, we can usually stitch up these weaknesses faster than attackers can exploit them—if we stay vigilant and keep learning.

Keep your teams sharp, your systems patched, and your senses a little bit suspicious.
Rely on AI for the drudge work, but layer human oversight where the stakes are highest.
Embed awareness into daily workflows, not just annual training days.

Having spent years weaving together automation, marketing, and a fair share of digital war stories, I’m more convinced than ever: progress and prudence must share the driver’s seat. There’s no shattering every risk, but you can tip the scales strongly in your favour—one well-informed user and one custom filter at a time.

And if ever in doubt? Take a beat, have a second look at that “urgent” summary, and remember: your best filter is you.

Wait! Let’s Make Your Next Project a Success